First one is for Winter/cooler weather carry (Sig Sauer 229 .40 Cal with Trigger job and "Norton's Special" package by Robar) and the second is for Summer/hot weather carry (S&W 637 Airweight in .38 cal)
Just wish the second one was a S&W 940 Hammerless SS in 9MM like I used to have. I still kick myself for ever selling her!!!! Damm it man...
G.B., 2- VERY nice weapons! trade ya a 45 for them both, J.K. as for hammer-less revolvers, even though I prefer a hammer for single action shooting.for concealed carry the hammer-less will come out of a pocket easier, but once you start pulling the trigger the hammer becomes exposed. the humpback types with a totally enclosed at all times hammer shroud (even though I hate the look of them) can be fired right through a coat pocket without having to worry about them hanging up on any fabric. and pockets tend to collect a lot of sand/grit/lint that will effect a revolver less than an auto. not to mention if you get a bullet with a bad primer in a revolver it's no biggie, in an auto you're screwed.
Thanks, yeah those 642's are OK, but I can't stand that "Hump Back"...
M12Gunboy what do u carry ur 229? I have been looking but it's so heavy. lol
M12Gunboy what do u carry ur 229? I have been looking but it's so heavy. lol
First one is for Winter/cooler weather carry (Sig Sauer 229 .40 Cal with Trigger job and "Norton's Special" package by Robar) and the second is for Summer/hot weather carry (S&W 637 Airweight in .38 cal)
