YES.. there is a big difference.. 400 would be underspined which can cause all kinds of flight problems
Ditto
If you go the Easton route you'll need their 340 shaft and not the 400
Well you can go heavy on the head and have more drop or you could drop poundage on a lighter spine ether way your losing something. Test it, tune it get it right and lose nothing.
Well you can go heavy on the head and have more drop or you could drop poundage on a lighter spine ether way your losing something. Test it, tune it get it right and lose nothing.
Yep.. there is definitly th eultimate combination for every bow, arrow, broadhead,, the fun is finding that combo :toast
I shoot the same shafts with a 31" 70lb bow. I use both the original crimson talon fixed BH or muzzy 3 blade, all 100 grain. Use what you're comfortable with and have confidence in, that's what counts. I think alot of hardcore archery guys overthink the sport way too much. Once you have confidence in your equipment, I would heavily concentrate on scouting as you can be the best shot in the world and never get a chance to prove it if your scouting is insufficient.
If you are going to shoot over say 65 lb. draw weight I would move up to a 340 spine arrow. A 400 spine you will find to flex a little too much and be a little inconsistent where a 340 (easton) or 350 carbon express will flex less upon release and produce an more consistent result. They also tend to weigh a little more than the 400 spine and will produce better kinetic energy down range. I do arrows and my personal preferrence would be either the easton axis or the pro hunter also by easton. Awesome arrows
