Notifications
Clear all

2010-11 Season WMA harvest report

13 Posts
11 Users
0 Likes
3,768 Views
Mr. Lolo
Posts: 524
Topic starter
(@mr-lolo)
Honorable Member
Joined: 16 years ago

Questions for those who read this harvest report, Am I correct in interpreting “+AM” as antlered male deer and “–AM” as antlerless male deer?

http://myfwc.com/media/1379932/harvest-data.pdf

12 Replies
hunter1005
Posts: 112
(@hunter1005)
Estimable Member
Joined: 16 years ago

That is the way I see it.

Reply
Iluv2hunt
Posts: 12399
(@iluv2hunt)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 17 years ago

I believe it includes all bucks with antlers under 5"....If I remember right

Reply
john l
Posts: 3825
(@john-l)
Famed Member
Joined: 17 years ago

Some of that data is way wrong as far as the # of deer killed.

Reply
JBUG308
Posts: 578
(@jbug308)
Honorable Member
Joined: 15 years ago

Some of that data is way wrong as far as the # of deer killed.

The FWC can only log the data from the deer that are checked out at the check stations. It only includes numbers from the WMA's on the list. Technically it isn't "wrong". It is what they have recorded. Now if they stated the these rock solid numbers of animals killed on each WMA, their data would be inaccurate.

Reply
Page 1 / 3
Share: